Peer Review of Julia Davenport

This post was great to not only help a classmate, but to look back at my own project to see what I can improve. 

• The name of the title and author for the project you reviewed.

I reviewed Julia Davenport’s Production Report 1.

• A working hyperlink to the project you reviewed.

My comment on Julia’s podcast segment can be found here.

• An explanation of the peer review activity you selected for the project you reviewed.

The activity that I selected was the form review activity. I made sure that here segment from her podcast followed the conventions of a podcast and flowed well throughout the entire piece.

• An explanation of how you think you helped the author with your feedback (in other words, how did you help them make their work better?)

I think that I helped Julia with her podcast because the addition of music was the only thing that I felt she was missing within the conventions. The use of music can help greatly because it can help set the tone for the rest of the podcast.

• An explanation of how you incorporated something from the suggested Student’s Guide readings (or any other course materials, if you’d prefer) into your feedback.

I mentioned the part about organization in the Student’s Guide. The addition of music in the beginning helps the project flow much better.

·        One thing about their work that you admired or think you could learn from.

One thing that I can learn from is the use of quotes from someone personally in the situation that my project is about. Julia uses a quote from someone who panhandles and it really supports the point she is trying to make.