This post made me realize why I write the way I do
involving pronouns that it is effective to use pronouns in particular ways.
1.
Based on your analysis, how effective is
your pronoun usage in Project 1? What does actively examining your pronoun
usage tell you about your writing style?
I
believe that my pronoun usage is very well done. I am very clear with who I am
talking about at the specific point in my QRG and this allows the reader to
understand more clearly what is happening in the story.
2. Are
there any instances in your project where you speak to or refer directly to the
audience? If so, how effective are these moments at creating a bond or
connection between audience and author? If not, why not? Explain why you're
choosing to leave your audience out of your writing. There's nothing wrong with
that, per se, but you should be able to give a sophisticated explanation of
your choices.
The only
point where I speak to the audience directly is when I am describing Seattle. I
think that this is very effective because it makes the reader feel more
connected to the description that I am giving. The reason that I do not address
them in the rest of my writing is because I feel I am telling them a story that
does not involve them. I am informing them not talking about them.
 |
| Fagen, Adam. "Sunset Over Puget Sound" 10/04/08 via Flickr. Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic License |
No comments:
Post a Comment