Monday, January 25, 2016

Evaluation of New York Times Stories

It was very interesting to read the two stories. Both have a great deal to do with the popular news recently and they are both extremely intriguing. The first story is from the business section of The New York Times and it speaks on the state of Africa's economy. The second story is from the opinion section and talks about new laws that are in place in New York City.

First Story

1. Does there seem to be a "main character" or "protagonist" to the story? If so, who is it and how are they are the "center" of the story? If not, are there any important or central characters in the story at all? What role do they play?

Although there are not true characters in this story, the main focus is on these African nations. The reporter that wrote this article, was able to talk to a couple business owners in a few nations and they all told similar stories. The African economy is struggling to grow because of China's economic struggles. These men and women are speaking about their specific businesses, but they are also speaking about Africa in general. The shipments from China are not coming in fast enough due to layoffs in China and the products are becoming less demanded. 

2. Where do the specific events in the story take place? Is there a specific setting? Describe the settings for the stories and how they influence the plot and characters.

The main settings in this story are South Africa and Nigeria. These are the two strongest economies in Africa historically and they are struggling currently. They are not able to produce as they used to because of China's struggles. Businesses in South Africa have had to fire people due to the slowdown in work. Those businesses in Nigeria have struggled due to the lack of demand for oil, the nation’s largest commodity. Both countries have been criticized because economic experts believe the nations could have done better to expand their economies during the good economic periods but they failed to do so.

3. Is there any kind of disagreement or debate happening in the story? If so, who is participating, why are people debating and what seems to be at stake for the different characters in the story?

The disagreement that occurs in this story is between different African officials. Some of these officials believe that China is much more respectable when it comes to negotiations and loans than the western countries. Others believe that the Chinese are less romantic about their approaches than they used to be and that it is simply business now. It feels as though some of these officials are losing faith in China. They think that their economy is going downhill a bit and they want a change. 

Second Story

1. Does there seem to be a "main character" or "protagonist" to the story? If so, who is it and how are they are the "center" of the story? If not, are there any important or central characters in the story at all? What role do they play?

The police and the new laws are the main focus of this story. The author is focused on the fact these new laws give the police in New York City to be more lenient to those that commit low level offenses. Although there are no new bench marks for punishments, these new laws are hoped to give relief to the communities that struggle with incarceration rates. 

 2. Where do the specific events in the story take place? Is there a specific setting? Describe the settings for the stories and how they influence the plot and characters.

As stated before, these laws are intended for New York City. New York City has many people that struggle with poverty and incarceration and these laws are intended to help with these two aspects. When people are incarcerated for low level offenses, they can lose their jobs, homes, and futures for an unworthy reason. If people are able to just pay a fine or do community service instead of time in a jail cell, then the GDP of these poor areas can grow and help the overall population.

3. Is there any kind of disagreement or debate happening in the story? If so, who is participating, why are people debating and what seems to be at stake for the different characters in the story?

The argument in this story comes from those that say the injustice for colored communities will just shift from one court to another with these laws. Even though they are not getting thrown in jail as much anymore, does not mean that colored people are not getting treated unfairly by the system. It is not identified in the story, but this group thinks that there needs to be a more severe change in the system in order to truly solve the problem. 
The U.S. Army. "Meeting the New York Police Department" 03/17/04
via Flickr. Attribution 2.0 Generic License.

No comments:

Post a Comment